This case study is part of the new Public Health: Research into Policy pilot, which seeks to strengthen links between public health researchers at the University and policymakers. The pilot was launched by the Cambridge Institute of Public Health and the PublicHealth@Cambridge Network, and is overseen by a steering group including representatives from the Public Policy SRI and CSaP. Case studies are being added to the website throughout the lifespan of the pilot. For any enquiries related to the pilot, please contact Lauren Milden, Public Health Policy Coordinator, via firstname.lastname@example.org.
Meningitis is a devastating infection that causes the swelling of the meninges, the membranes surrounding the brain and spinal cord. It can lead to brain damage and deafness, as well as fatalities. The land mass stretching from Senegal to Ethiopia is known as the “meningitis belt” and during the past 100 years has suffered epidemics that have killed thousands and disabled even more, the bulk of victims being children and youth. Thankfully, in 2010, the MenAfriVac® vaccine was introduced. With over 235 million people immunised so far, the caseload of meningitis A has been eliminated in immunised populations.
However, Dr Trotter’s research assistant Andromachi Karachaliou and her colleagues showed that without a long-term vaccination programme, meningitis A would return to the region within 15 years. The team used mathematical modelling to examine the most effective vaccination strategy to ensure the population was protected in the long term, which informed World Health Organisation (WHO) recommendations. The success of the MenAfriVac® also changed the makeup of the meningitis threat, which prompted WHO to commission Dr Trotter to review operational thresholds for other serogroups of meningitis, which dictate timelines to act to prevent or to respond to epidemics. Dr Trotter analysed district-level surveillance data to show that initiating vaccination programmes earlier would prevent more cases of meningitis than would lowering the epidemic threshold, which led WHO to lower the alert thresholds, thus allowing more time to prepare for a rapid response once the epidemic threshold was reached.